[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:19:20 -0400 (EDT) |
991028 Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 1999, Klaus Weide (address@hidden) said:
> | * Protect INSERTFILE and EDITTEXTAREA from generating memory access
> | violations if the inserted file has lines that are too long for
> | the buffer used. An alert message is issued and the long lines
> | are truncated.
> While lynx is normally "quiet" (something I strongly agree with),
> in this case, since data can be lost, might not this be a good place
> to make an exception to that (quiet) behavior, and "beep" the user?
> Also, issuing the alert message twice might be desirable,
> to be sure and give the user enough time to read it.
no & no (smile)! let one ant in the house & the whole nest follows.
let's keep Lynx as silent as a trolley bus:
people can set ALERT_SECS to be as long as they wish.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: more TRST support (was: Re: lynx-dev another largish patch), (continued)
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch, rjp, 1999/10/27
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/10/27
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/10/28
Re: lynx-dev another largish patch, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/27