Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION

[T.E.Dickey]

> 
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 address@hidden wrote: 
>  
> > Hmmm.  I just tried it with the lynx-dev page: 
> >  
> >    Linkname: Lynx-Dev Discussion List 
> >         URL: http://www.crl.com/~subir/lynx/lynx_help/lynx-dev.html 
> >  
> > The only difference is that the version (p)rinted from the source view 
> > lacks blank lines present in the (d)ownloaded version.  I suppose this 
> > can be configured out, but the lesson is at least that there may be 
> > differences unless you know precisely what options to select. 
>  
> Clearly a bug. 

that was the general consensus two weeks ago (recently broken).
  
> If everybody thinks now that bugs are features and nobody complains 
> about them then the bugs won't get fixed. 
>  
> Will the person who broke print_wwwfile_to_fd please fix it?! 

I haven't gotten to that yet (and don't offhand know if I or someone else
broke it).  Expect a new development patch on Wednesday (tomorrow I'm
tied up).
  
>    Klaus 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey