[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev reverse search
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev reverse search |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 02:24:13 -0600 |
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000, Henry Nelson (address@hidden) said:
|
| > I forsee alot of ifdef's and/or config options ... all of which *could*
|
| Please try to avoid as much extraneous configuration options as possible.
| Lynx used to be so simple and so slick.
I agree.
| > be done. But is it really worth it?
|
| P)rint option to view either rendered or source with "most" gives pretty
| good search in both directions, and is it ever fast on machines short on
| memory resources. (I know it's not what you all want, but it's an
| alternative that raises the question of programming hours vs. usefulness.)
Adding code to do a "reverse search" would, I think, be pretty minimal
(and would be portable, and NOT require config options or ifdef's).
It is the adding of regexp's to the search function(s) that gives me
pause ...
/kim
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/07/27
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Kim DeVaughn, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Vlad Harchev, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, David Combs, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Vlad Harchev, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, pg, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/07/28
Re: lynx-dev reverse search, pg, 2000/07/27
Re: lynx-dev reverse search, Henry Nelson, 2000/07/28