[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.19

From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.19
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:48:36 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:28:46PM -0800, Rob Cameron wrote:
> I think there is still one remaining problem in the restrictions
> table of LYUtils.c: the boolean values of some "can" fields need
> to be negated.  A value of TRUE for this field for a particular
> restriction would mean that the restriction is set to false by the
> line 
>               *(restrictions[i].flag) = !restrictions[i].can;
> when the "default" or anonymous restrictions are set.  But in each

I noted that the table shows the (pre)existing behavior - and in theory tend
to agree with your assessment, but am curious if anyone who is using it
in anonymous mode can explain why those items are set that way.

Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]