[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] 8+4 WAY BETTER memory management
From: |
Roland Arendes |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] 8+4 WAY BETTER memory management |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:42:08 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi
I have to say that the current cvs (8+4) is better in managing memory.
This is done in 5-30 minute intervals.
donkey 18428 71.0 14.4 57456 55804 ttyp2 DN 09:11 20:02 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 69.5 15.1 60272 58616 ttyp2 RN 09:11 41:33 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 70.0 14.9 59504 57880 ttyp2 DN 09:11 44:21 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 70.2 15.0 60016 58384 ttyp2 RN 09:11 46:06 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 70.5 16.3 65136 63424 ttyp2 RN 09:11 47:39 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 70.5 15.3 61040 59392 ttyp2 RN 09:11 49:19 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 69.9 15.4 61552 59896 ttyp2 DN 09:11 50:03 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 69.4 16.3 65136 63424 ttyp2 RN 09:11 51:15 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 69.4 15.3 61040 59392 ttyp2 RN 09:11 51:18 ./mldonkey
donkey 18428 69.7 15.3 61040 59392 ttyp2 RN 09:11 62:04 ./mldonkey
With the old 8+3, the memory usage would now already grow at 150M+
It seems that there is no leak anymore. But I'll watch further.
Mldonkey, what did you change?
-chemical
- [Mldonkey-users] 8+4 WAY BETTER memory management,
Roland Arendes <=