[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16)
|
From: |
Roland Arendes |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:48:58 +0100 (CET) |
|
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.0 RC2a |
Hi
>> > It's always got beyond 90%. So was a great deal of bandwidth just
>> > crap?
>> mldonkey now remove sources after one failed connection if their file
>> is popular and there are other sources available...
> Ah, that explains it. BTW: I didn't mean "bandwidth was crap" but
> "crapped sources". I couldn't believe this.
Which does obviously work well with QoS. Some traffic queues actively drop
packets to stay within the defined range (like HTB), and this mechanism
works very well.
At least my 2 test machines are working better with -16 + HTB.
Roland
- [Mldonkey-users] default options, Mike Jones, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] default options, MLdonkey, 2003/02/20
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] default options, Pierre Etchemaite, 2003/02/21
- [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), tristate, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), MLdonkey, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), Michael Panteleit, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), MLdonkey, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), Michael Panteleit, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16),
Roland Arendes <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), nospam, 2003/02/21
- AW: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), tristate, 2003/02/21
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] source_management (2.02-16), Nacho Ruiz, 2003/02/21