[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake?
From: |
Christian Hopp |
Subject: |
Re: Automake? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:02:27 +0200 (CEST) |
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Here's a first pass at an autoconf reworking. This patch doesn't remove
> the ARCH settings yet, it just lays foundation so that they can be
> removed later.
I don't think that the ARCH setting can be removed later. Esp. my
resource code would be too difficult to implement if you just use
HAVE_.* . We should think of a peaceful coexistence.
I have just some questions about the automake usage. I am not used to
it (just if download some software from time to time). It's of course
to all on the list (no justification of automake in general... just to
monit).
* What are the advantages with it (dev/use)?
* How it the integration process now? Do I need to encapsulate any
#include with #ifdef HAVE_.* #endif?
* What includes/features do you consider not system dependent? What
has to be checked in configure what not?
* Would you #include now every "non-project" header file in config.h
instead of c-file itself?
* Do you see any development overhead/speedup in using auto(make|.*)?
A nice weekend to everyone on the list,
Christian
--
Christian Hopp email: address@hidden
Institut für Elektrische Informationstechnik fon: +49-5323-72-2113
Technische Universität Clausthal fax: +49-5323-72-3197
pgpkey: https://www.iei.tu-clausthal.de/pgp-keys/chopp.key.asc (2001-11-22)
- Automake?, Mark Ferlatte, 2002/08/16
- Re: Automake?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/08/20
- Re: Automake?, Mark Ferlatte, 2002/08/20
- Re: Automake?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/08/20
- Re: Automake?, Christian Hopp, 2002/08/20
- Re: Automake?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/08/26
- Re: Automake?, Christian Hopp, 2002/08/26