[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: monitoring network filesystem

From: Martin Pala
Subject: Re: monitoring network filesystem
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:00:39 +0200

I Agree, will change it to Aleksander's syntax.

I have used the 'if failed' just to keep the common test declaration syntax, 
even though with 'existence' test it looked strange.

On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:

> On 9. juli 2010, at 17.42, Martin Pala wrote:
>>   check file with path /path/to/netfs/lost+found
>>      if failed existence for 5 cycles then exec "/path/to/scripts/"
> I must say I like Aleksander's "if does not exist" version much better than; 
> "if failed existence" which sounds like an excerpt from Nietzsche's work on 
> existentialism.
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Aleksander Kamenik wrote:
>>> Something like this would be perfect (I don't care about content, so the 
>>> lost+found folder is a great choice in my case):
>>> check folder lost+found path /path/to/netfs/lost+found
>>> if does not exist then exec "/path/to/scripts/"
> --
> To unsubscribe:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]