[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian
From: |
Ludovic Brenta |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:08:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Francis Russell writes:
> Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> I retrieved your GPG key from pgp.surfnet.nl and noticed your key has no
>> signatures on it. However, I also see elsewhere[1] that your key has
>> the signature of David McBride <address@hidden>, who is in the Web of
>> Trust[2]. So, I think I can trust that the signature belongs to you.
>> However it would be nice if you could upload your signed GPG key some
>> time in the future.
>
> Strange. Running 'gpg --keyserver pgp.surfnet.nl --recv-keys ADC2828F'
> followed by 'gpg --list-sigs' on a fresh gpg config showed all the
> signatures to be present for me (although the user-ids missing for the
> signers).
That must be because you already had your own key in your local keyring :)
>> I also pushed all the branches org.debian.monotone.* to the Ada-France
>> database. From now on you can commit to the branch org.debian.monotone
>> to help with packaging monotone itself. Please ping me after pushing to
>> the Ada-France database so I know I have to review your changes, compile
>> and upload to Debian. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
>
> Thanks, although I think you got the org.debian.monotone.* branches but
> not org.debian.monotone itself which seems to be where all the work is
> being done. I can always push that one myself, but I thought I'd let you
> do it.
OK, that was an oversight on my part; pushed now.
> Is it convention to just keep appending to the latest UNRELEASED
> changelog entry then update it to unstable on release? That seems the
> most sensible thing but I notice an UNRELEASED for 0.44-1 which I
> assumed would never happen.
Yes, that's what we usually do. In addition, we tag the revisions that
we upload. 0.44-1 was never uploaded indeed, we went straight to
0.44-2. I don't remember why exactly. We also skipped 0.46 entirely.
The problem with the lack of maintenance work going into monotone is not
new.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
- [Monotone-debian] Bug#574512: Release-critical bugs in monotone: ping?, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/01
- [Monotone-debian] Re: Bug#574512: Release-critical bugs in monotone: ping?, Francis Russell, 2010/06/01
- [Monotone-debian] Re: Bug#574512: Release-critical bugs in monotone: ping?, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/01
- [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/01
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/02
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/02
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/03
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/03
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian,
Ludovic Brenta <=
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Richard Levitte, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Richard Levitte, 2010/06/05
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Richard Levitte, 2010/06/05
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/05
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/05
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Richard Levitte, 2010/06/06
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/06
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Francis Russell, 2010/06/06
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Monotone in Debian, Ludovic Brenta, 2010/06/06