Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Monotone w/out server machine

[Adam Logghe]

Hey John,

I just started using Monotone in the last 2 weeks and from my
perspective, coming from Arch I wouldn't have been as interested in
Monotone without netsync.

Prior to this change, Monotone really wasn't "peer to peer". You were
forced to go to a web/nntp/mail server as a central depot.

Now because the monotone binary is the server too, I can run monotone
serve on my workstation and do a "sync" from my laptop. Then I take the
laptop to work and fire up "serve" from my desktop there and "sync" from
my laptop.

As I think through the perambulations of working+synching branches with
colleagues this really seems like a huge win being truly peer to peer.

The only real negative I see is not having the ability to "sync" through
 companies that have http proxy only setups (uggggh I hate that). In
this situation you could pull down an entire copy of someones monotone
db. Then run it as a server and sync yourself with that and then pass it
back out to the internet.

Anyway, very happy here with Monotone.

Adam

graydon hoare wrote:
> John Ilves wrote:
>
>> I've seen several references to using a mailing list, nntp server or
>> cgi script as a depot with Monotone, instead of running a Monotone
>> server. I cannot however find anything in the Monotone documentation
>> about this. How would you go about using Monotone in this way?
>
>
> this mode of operation has been removed from monotone; it used to work
> that way, but it required an unacceptable degree of inter-machine and
> temporal coupling -- machines had to keep sequence numbers for one
> another -- so we switched to a new protocol (netsync).
>
> sorry about this. it's a tradeoff. we could have continued to run that
> way, but I felt the costs outweighed the benefits.
>
> -graydon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel