[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy)
From: |
Vladimir Prus |
Subject: |
Re: boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy) |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:39:46 +0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 10:39, Jon Bright wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > That's because Win32 GUI applications don't have argv (at least you can't
> > get on it in anyway portable way), so not providing tokenization code for
> > win32 would be very bad.
>
> I'm guessing by "portable way", you're including the 9x series? If not,
> you could use GetCommandLine and CommandLineToArgvW, which are
> supported on all NT versions.
Yea, I would not like to exclude 9x series. At least Windows 98 is still it
use. And there are various _argv variables, but I could not verify that they
are available under the same name on all windows compilers.
- Volodya
- [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Jeremy Cowgar, 2005/04/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2005/04/02
- boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy), Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/02
- Re: boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy), Vladimir Prus, 2005/04/04
- Re: boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy), Jon Bright, 2005/04/05
- Re: boost::program_options (was Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy),
Vladimir Prus <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: boost::program_options, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: boost::program_options, Corey Halpin, 2005/04/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/04
Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/02
Re: [Monotone-devel] popt buggy, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/02