[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs
From: |
Andy Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:08:26 +0100 |
Presumably this would also be a trivial change.
On 12/09/05, Jon Bright <address@hidden> wrote:
> Andy Jones wrote:
> > Using hash values was the right thing to do.
> >
> > But it would be nice if they were displayed in a more human-readable way.
>
> I also agree with this. For me,
>
> 568b-2462-456e-9a57-4326-93df-936d-4835
>
> would be much more readable than
>
> 568b2462456e9a57432693df936d4835
>
> --
> Jon Bright
> Silicon Circus Ltd.
> http://www.siliconcircus.com
>
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Hendrik Boom, 2005/09/07
[Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Lapo Luchini, 2005/09/09
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Hendrik Boom, 2005/09/09
Re: [Monotone-devel] Proposal for human readable revision IDs, Steven Grimm, 2005/09/06