Re: [Monotone-devel] rosters status update

[Jon Bright]

Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> roster-enabled monotone for development.  You probably _won't_ want to
> upgrade to this.  We will warn strenously against it in the release
> notes.  (Of course, some of you probably will anyway, bless your
> hearts.)  After a month or so of daily use, we will presumably have
> the main issues shaken out, and roll another release, that we will
> actually people upgrade to.

To avoid confusing anyone just coming to monotone, or people who don't 
follow monotone development that closely (they're just using it because 
the project that they work on happens to use it, or whatever), could I 
suggest using a noticeably different version number for the 
don't-upgrade release?  0.25 would look like a normal change for someone 
not following the list.  0.25.dontupgrade or something?

Alternatively, maybe just don't advertise that there's a new version at 
all (on the website, at least).

Of course, you may already have such a plan.

--
Jon