[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Debian apt-friendly monotone archive
|
From: |
Nicolas Ruiz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Debian apt-friendly monotone archive |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:11:02 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steven E. Harris wrote:
> Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> writes:
>
> I decided to ask here because the "testing" version is still at
> 0.19-1. The "unstable" version is at 0.24-1, which is fresh enough for
> my needs. However, I'm out of practice with apt, trying to recall if
> it's possible to only expose my system to a select few packages from
> "unstable" without dragging all the current "testing" packages into
> the upgrade dance.
# apt-get install -t unstable monotone
would install the "unstable" version of monotone.
# apt-get install -st unstable gimp
would show which packages would be installed (without performing the
actual installation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDutpWlmRickEXuVYRAkNLAJ98Xg5pZYZ69jp+Z61YOiqreBPiXQCfeT3f
q2fwaHLZy1a0DR6WrM+++Do=
=ySkJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Monotone-devel] Debian apt-friendly monotone archive, Steven E. Harris, 2006/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Debian apt-friendly monotone archive, Florian Weimer, 2006/01/04
- [Monotone-devel] No Security for "monotone read": Why?, Logan Sackette, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] No Security for "monotone read": Why?, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] No Security for "monotone read": Why?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] No Security for "monotone read": Why?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/01/04