[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:09:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Quoting Matthew Hannigan:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:50:51AM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> > Again: solution is trivial. "Transform what I ask you to (LF->CRLF and
> > back) and don't mess with anything special (like CR->CRLF etc)."
>
> The other nice thing about this is that it's perfectly
> reversible, even for 'binary' files.
But what, if my binary contains an LF somewhere? After a check-in-check-out
cycle, I will see this replaced with CRLF, won't I?
> On a slightly different note, perhaps it would be best
> for monotone to store the literal version and only transform
> for the purposes of diffing or checksumming/sigs.
Or *upon request* into native style in my working copy only; and warn me about
inconsistent line-endings then.
Thomas
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions,
Thomas Moschny <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Ethan Blanton, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Ethan Blanton, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, rghetta, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Zbynek Winkler, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Nuno Lucas, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug in CRLF conversions, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/02/02