[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again)
From: |
Nuno Lucas |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again) |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:23:56 +0000 |
On 2/26/06, Nathaniel Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> What to switch to:
> -- "mt" is the most natural choice, but not available. Annoying,
> since no-one uses the old mt command anymore, but there you go.
> -- I'm kind of fond of "m" (take _that_, you upstart 2-letter
> systems like hg!), but it got shouted down the last time I
> suggested it :-).
> -- "mmm" -- less boring than other suggestions, has appropriate
> associations ;-), and is, in fact, a mono-tone... but just
> perhaps a bit too cute. Also, annoying to type.
> -- "moto" -- dunno, also has nice associations. That it's 4 letters
> is a bit unfortunate... maybe "mto" would be a compromise,
> keeping the short pronounciation...
> -- "mtn" -- the boring, generic choice. Of course, sometimes boring
> is good.
I ended aliasing with "mnt":
-- "mnt" -- same arguments as "mtn", but 'm' is next to 'n' and you only
type "mn" and let TAB auto-complete the rest, adding the space at the
end, as "mt" blocks that from happening with "mtn" ;)
Let the flamewar begin...
Regards,
~Nuno Lucas
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), hendrik, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Matt Johnston, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Daniel THOMPSON, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Emile Snyder, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again),
Nuno Lucas <=