Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Rosterify and certificate keys

[Derek Scherger]

Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Right... this is, after all, part of the point of having revision ids
> :-).

Do we really need revision ids in the changelog certs at all? I mean, if 
you're looking at the output of 'monotone log' the 'Ancestor:' lines are 
definitive and correct. So perhaps the propagate message should just 
include the source and target branch names and not the specific revision 
ids. As far as merges go, perhaps the changelog should simply be 
"merged" or something.

Cheers,
Derek