[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC)
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:19:11 -0700 |
On 7/11/06, Timothy Brownawell <address@hidden> wrote:
The new testsuite seems to be "done" now, but some things aren't optimal
yet.
If you're looking for new features, consider making it capable of
running tests in parallel. (Bonus points for participating in
gnumake's "job server" algorithm, so that "make -jN check" does the
Right Thing automatically.) This can be a huge speedup.
zw
- [Monotone-devel] Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/06
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC),
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/19