[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question
From: |
Jeronimo Pellegrini |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:47:12 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:38:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Timothy Brownawell schreef:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 12:20 -0700, Rob Schoening wrote:
> >> Is there a recommended way to roll a particular file or files back to
> >> a particular revision? "mtn update" affects the entire workspace,
> >> which I don't want. Obviously "mtn cat -r revision foo.txt >foo.txt "
> >> will work, but this seems wrong.
> >>
> >> Is it? Or is there a better way?
> >
> > No, that's the right (only) way. What seems wrong about it?
>
> monotone update <file> -r<rev> would seem a bit more logical.
I agree. No need for handling of pipes by the user or temporary files.
J.
- [Monotone-devel] Dumb Question, Rob Schoening, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Dumb Question, Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Koen Kooi, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question,
Jeronimo Pellegrini <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Koen Kooi, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/12
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question, Rob Schoening, 2006/07/13
- FAQ on wiki (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: FAQ on wiki (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question), Daniel Carosone, 2006/07/13
- Re: FAQ on wiki (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Dumb Question), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13