|
From: | Tony Tung |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] tweaking ancestry after cvs_import |
Date: | Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:42:17 -0700 |
On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:cvs_import is relatively simplistic on how it does things. It's far better to use something like tailor or the cvssync branch (which I understand is going to a major overhaul) to have a more accurate representation of the cvs tree.Err... I'm pretty sure tailor doesn't support branches at all. cvssync didn't use to, though I think there's some code in there for it now... Christof would know better exactly what it can do wrt branch reconstruction. -- Nathaniel
Thanks to all of you for the tips. I'll take a look at the cvssync branch.
Any thoughts on how to indicate a branch collapse in the database? As I understand it, the predecessors' hash is part of the computation of the revision hash. That would mean that all successor hashes would need to be updated....
Tony
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |