Re: RFC: mtn split (Was: [Monotone-devel] Best practice using monotone)

[Andy Jones]

Hmm.  That's kind of counterintuitive, isn't it?  "approve" and
"dissaprove" aren't mutually exclusive.

On 24/08/06, Andy Jones <address@hidden> wrote:
> Oooh!  People who use "dissaprove"!  Keep talking.  Do you use
> "approve" too?  For what?
>
> On 24/08/06, Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >         mtn disapprove B
> > >
> > > This will "internally create a new revision with the reverse diff as a
> > > child of B".  So we get,
> >            ^--- Should be "A"
> >
> > >                 A--B--C
> > >                 `--BR
> >
> > --
> > Chad Walstrom <address@hidden>           http://www.wookimus.net/
> >            assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
> > --
> > Chad Walstrom <address@hidden>           http://www.wookimus.net/
> >            assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Monotone-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
> >