[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Dec 2006 01:57:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:27, you wrote:
> certificates are difficult to get right delta encoded.
What does that mean exactly? And ...
> They are not compressed by default.
> Also certificates are expansive (storage wise)
... does the user (and a cvs- or whatever-sync application could be
considered 'using' monotone's infrastructure) really have to care about this?
These are implementation details being not part of the interface.
> and are of number 1:n (more than one certificate of a type for a given
> release is possible)
>
> Major benefit: You can add certificates to an already existing revision.
- Thomas
- [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/12/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Thomas Moschny, 2006/12/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Christof Petig, 2006/12/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments,
Thomas Moschny <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/12/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Thomas Keller, 2006/12/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/12/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Thomas Moschny, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/12/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Chad Walstrom, 2006/12/04
Re: [Monotone-devel] Manifest Comments, Christof Petig, 2006/12/03