[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparen
|
From: |
Christof Petig |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:18:20 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) |
Christof Petig schrieb:
> Please do not get me wrong: I was explaining why I could not honestly
> ask for funding, I was not intending to say that engineers should not
> need funding.
It's difficult to get sensitive stuff non ambiguously: please insert "in
general" after engineers.
Christof
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?, Christof Petig, 2006/12/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?,
Christof Petig <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Summit funding, was: basic_io not binary transparent?, Nathaniel J. Smith, 2006/12/19