[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Why?
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Why? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:11:03 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:27:41AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Why has the asciik command reproduced what complete() does, more or
> less verbatim? Yeah, I noticed that there's the definition of the
> asciik grap(10) smack in the middle, but that definition doesn't have
> to be there. Does anyone mind of I clean that up a bit? I'm all for
> reuse of code, but this doesn't look like the right way to me.
The asciik command is just a developer's hack to test the asciik code.
Note that it is in command group "debug", the magic group that is
never shown to the user...
-- Nathaniel
--
"Of course, the entire effort is to put oneself
Outside the ordinary range
Of what are called statistics."
-- Stephan Spender
- [Monotone-devel] Why?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2007/02/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Why?,
Nathaniel Smith <=