Re: [Monotone-devel] RFC: 'suspend' certs

[William Uther]

On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:

> willu.mailingLists> ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ 
> Color_of_the_bikeshed )
>
> It should be clear by now that the bikeshed must be colored violet
> with pink dots.

Green!

On 07/07/2007, at 12:02 PM, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:

> Shouldn't it then be "suspended" instead of "suspend"?

The name of the cert is irrelevant as the user never sees it.  The  
name of the command should be "suspend" because it is a command, not  
a description of the state of the branch.

On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:

> Only one, really: how do we handle irresponsable usage of that cert.
> I would normally expect developers to be responsable (and I'm sure
> there are a few laughing at this point ;-)), but I can also imagine
> cases when developers become childish over issues and could go into a
> suspend war.  Should we care?

Normal mechanisms apply.  In particular, you can personally choose  
not to trust certs by a particular developer.

Will        :-}