[Monotone-devel] Re: Merging suspend branch

[Lapo Luchini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

William Uther wrote:
>   Most of the comments I got on my RFC about the suspend functionality
> were positive.  The few that weren't seemed to be satisfied with
> followup discussion.

An UI doubt just occurred to me: what about a branch that is merged on
the mainline and has no new revisions on it?
Does it have sense to still show it in the branch list?
It has "nothing new", in fact its full history is available from the
mainline, isn't that so?
Or should someone suspend his last branch-only revision?

In some cases, like "experimental feature that is nowadays a common
feature" showing the branch is useless, in other cases it may well be not.

    Lapo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=PS2F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----