[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Automate weirdness...

From: William Uther
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Automate weirdness...
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:59:26 +1000

On 02/08/2007, at 7:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:14:04PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
If you didn't produce the LF, then what would you do for parents (or
other commands that can return more than one): add a LF for each only
when there's more than one, or omit all LFs (so the callers needs to
know to split into 40 character chunks), or use LFs as separators, not

For that matter, it's possible that get_base_revision_id will return
multiple ids in the future, as support for workspace merge improves...

I guess I was expecting that with this fancy mechanism for breaking up a response into multiple chunks, those multiple chunks might actually be used for something.

At the moment "mtn au stdio" returns exactly the same as "mtn automate", but encoded in a format that allows pipelined commands. That is nice. It just isn't exactly what I was expecting when I saw the format allowed multiple chunks.


Will       :-}

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]