Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Fwd: gcc -O2 in buildbots? [Was: 0.37 dumps on my FreeBSD-6-stable amd64]

[Eric Christopher]

> > Hmm? What's the code in question?
> >
> > As far as which -O options to use, I've seen some c++ programs get
> > great use out of O3. O2 is very commonly used. Anything else starts to
> > get a bit out there. :)
>
> The problem is mtn 0.37 on amd64 FreeBSD dumps using -O2 or -O1 (but not
> with -O0).. I was wondering if it would be better to have the bots check
> optimized code directly, in order to be sure it is working as well and
> catching problems such as this as soon as they are committed.
>

I'd think so. If you have the buildbot time/space then a "debug" and a
"release" build probably wouldn't suck.

> BTW: the only change to roster.cc from 0.36 to 0.37 is the use of
> "vector.hh" instead of <vector>.
>

Interesting. Any change in what the header is? I.e. is it the same
vector include?

-eric