[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:40:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt) |
Markus Schiltknecht <address@hidden> writes:
> Note, that the above issue about the warning is how it *currently*
> works. While all of this "policy" discussion is how it *should* work.
> Thus I'm also stating that Abe's malicious revision shouldn't be
> propagated via netsync, because the project's policy distrusts it. So
> there's no warning and nothing for Beth to worry about.
Ok, that sounds good.
--
-- Stephe
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Boris, 2008/02/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/02/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Stephen Leake, 2008/02/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/02/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Stephen Leake, 2008/02/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/02/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Stephen Leake, 2008/02/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/02/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Brian May, 2008/02/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/02/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone,
Stephen Leake <=