Re: [Monotone-devel] 3rd party libraries

[Matthew Nicholson]

Markus Wanner wrote:

> In the archive I've read that boost::program_options didn't do what we
> want. Looking at the boots documentation, I also see boost::asio - could
> that perhaps be a better replacement for the (unmaintained) netxx?
> Anybody used boost::asio before?

I use boost::asio in my astxx library.  I have not had any problems with 
it, seems well designed.  Also there is a non-boost version of it for 
the anti boost crowd (I happen to be pro-boost).

--
Matthew Nicholson
matt-land.com