[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:56:36 -0800 |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Markus Wanner <address@hidden> wrote:
> I just wanted to test nvm.stripped on some OSes again, but unfortunately
> I can't even get automake to run through. automake-1.9 (from my debian
> sid development machine) just aborts without any I can identify as an
> error message.
There's two things that coulda gone wrong: first, I accidentally
checked in an incorrect change to Makefile.am last night; I've just
reverted that, so please update and try again. Second, if you're not
using autoreconf, you have to do the commands in this order or it
doesn't work:
aclocal-1.9 -I m4
autoheader
autoconf
automake-1.9 --add-missing --copy --no-force
(It doesn't seem to matter which order you do autoheader and autoconf
in, but aclocal has to be first and automake has to be last.)
I'm re-running "make distcheck" on my Debian sid machine, having used
automake-1.9 (normally I use 1.10) and will report whether it worked.
zw
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Stephen Leake, 2009/01/24
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Markus Wanner, 2009/01/31
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: nvm.stripped versus botan, Zack Weinberg, 2009/01/31