[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export
From: |
Felipe Contreras |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:59:04 +0200 |
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Derek Scherger <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> >> As I said, my objective is to generate git clone for people to
>> >> develop/follow/maintain instead of the mtn repo, in this case there no
>> >> need to have every single bit of information since the mtn repo would
>> >> still be available.
>> >
>> > Does a bit of "extra" information hurt this use-case somehow?
>>
>> Yes, because you see two changelogs appended instead of one, possibly
>> with the comments too. It doesn't look like a native git repo.
>>
>> >> On the other hand, when a project moves away from mtn to git, then
>> >> your method makes more sense.
>
> It seems to me that this directly contradicts your previous statement, that
> "looking like a native git repo" is somehow important for a mirrored
> repository and yet unimportant for a converted repository. Nonetheless, I'm
> tired of arguing about this and I've added a --use-one-changelog option that
> picks one and uses it. I will be very surprised if anyone else ever uses
> this option but it's harmless.
Appending two changelogs will never look 'natural', besides, some
people might not like the way two changelogs are appended. I think
that's the kind of decision that a team should do when converting a
repository. I'm just mirroring, I don't want to think about that, just
produce something that looks good and it's functional.
Please don't think I'm saying that option is *a must*, I'm just saying
that if it's not there I would have to modify the code, which is not a
big deal for me.
>> Could you make a patch that gets rid of the 'no branch' error?
>
> With any luck at all someone else will beat me to it. I've got too many
> other things on the go at the moment to get to this now but I will
> eventually if no one else does.
It looks like I've got it (attached).
--
Felipe Contreras
mtn.diff
Description: Binary data
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Derek Scherger, 2009/02/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Derek Scherger, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Derek Scherger, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Paul Aurich, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Derek Scherger, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export,
Felipe Contreras <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, hendrik, 2009/02/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] git fast-export, Felipe Contreras, 2009/02/28