Re: [Monotone-devel] automate sync display branches?

[Thomas Keller]

Am 12.09.10 02:54, schrieb Stephen Leake:
> Thomas Keller <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Am 11.09.10 22:12, schrieb Stephen Leake:
>>>> Am 11.09.10 18:09, schrieb Stephen Leake:
>>> There is quite a bit of overhead for a branch. Not so much in the db,
>>> but in the build environment.
>>>
>>> This is likely to be a very short-lived task.
>>
>> This is not a good excuse - 
> 
> Obviously, I disagree. But it's not worth fighting about.
> 
> I'll use nvm.automate_sync

Thanks for accepting this decision. As I've written earlier on IRC it
might be a good idea to team up with Tim (nvm.netsync) - see the
discussion here:

http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/monotone?date=2010-09-11#l55

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature