Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of 0.99

[Thomas Keller]

Am 28.11.10 19:55, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
> ...if I put the db and workspace on a spinning-oxide drive, I get these
> cold-cache times:
> 
>                   | fixed | 0.45 | 0.48
> status            | 1.1s  | 1.0s | 11s
>   w/o inodeprints | 6.4s  | 6.4s | 17s
> ls branches       | 2.8s  | 18s  | 11s
> 
> 
> Do we mind having an index-only schema change between 0.99 and 1.0? It
> sounds like we'd get a noticeably better user experience...

I'd rather like to avoid db migrations between 0.99 and 1.0, but I think
this one is very reasonable. So go ahead and merge your branch into nvm.

The current version numbering scheme doesn't make it clear whether pure
db migrations are allowed (http://wiki.monotone.ca/RoadMap/#index2h1). I
think they should be allowed and I'll change the section accordingly.

Thanks for your work!
Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature