[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Richard Levitte |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:46:51 +0100 (CET) |
In message <address@hidden> on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:43:38 -0800, Zack Weinberg
<address@hidden> said:
zackw> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Markus Wanner <address@hidden> wrote:
zackw> > Zack,
zackw> >
zackw> > Can you elaborate on what's wrong with that? libbotan1.7-dev correctly
zackw> > depends on libssl0.9.8, which provides libcrypto.so.0.9.8.
zackw> >
zackw> > And yes, linking that with -lcrypto works without the symlink
zackw> > libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.0.9.8. (Symlink only provided by
libssl-dev)
zackw>
zackw> Are you 100% sure that you can link a *program* with -lcrypto without
zackw> that symlink existing?
Nope.
: ; ls /usr/lib/libcrypto*
libcrypto.a libcryptopp.so.8 libcrypto++.so.8
libcrypto++.a libcrypto.so libcrypto++.so.8.0.0
libcryptopp.a libcrypto++.so
libcryptopp.so libcrypto.so.0.9.8
: ; gcc -o smallopenssl smallopenssl.c -lcrypto
: ; ./smallopenssl
OpenSSL library version: OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
: ; sudo mv /usr/lib/libcrypto.{,foo}so
[sudo] password for levitte:
: ; sudo mv /usr/lib/libcrypto.{,foo}a
: ; gcc -o smallopenssl smallopenssl.c -lcrypto
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
---- BEGIN: smallopenssl.c ----
#include <openssl/crypto.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
main()
{
printf("OpenSSL library version: %s\n", SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_VERSION));
}
---- END: smallopenssl.c ----
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Richard Levitte <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/20