[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 10:17:08 -0700 |
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body
>> >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in
>> >> particular, code under v2-only). It would also make us
>> >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds
>> >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2).
>> >
>> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2.
>> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3.
>>
>> I said v2-only.
>
> Yes, we're in agreement. The v2-only item was at the end of my first
> sentence. The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both
> sentences.
I misunderstood you. Sorry about that. I agree with your assessment.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Hendrik Boom, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Stephen Leake, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Hendrik Boom, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Hendrik Boom, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Richard Levitte, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Stephen Leake, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Ludovic Brenta, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/21