monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone


From: Zack Weinberg
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 10:17:08 -0700

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body
>> >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in
>> >> particular, code under v2-only).  It would also make us
>> >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds
>> >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2).
>> >
>> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2.
>> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3.
>>
>> I said v2-only.
>
> Yes, we're in agreement.  The v2-only item was at the end of my first
> sentence.  The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both
> sentences.

I misunderstood you.  Sorry about that.  I agree with your assessment.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]