[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
From: |
Markus Wanner |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11 |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2014 20:09:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 |
Jack,
over here at the monotone mailing list, we're discussing a move to
C++11, partly inspired by botan's move.
On 05/13/2014 07:29 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned that botan is switching to C++11. (And just notice
> that botan even states gcc-4.7 as the minimum requirement for 1.11 onwards.)
What are your plans for botan 1.10.x? Does that branch keep getting
bug-fixes after the 1.12.0 release? (I guess so, but don't remember
reading a policy or roadmap or the like on your website.)
Regarding the new standard: What was your experience with the switch to
C++11, so far? Would you recommend the monotone project to switch?
Regards
Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Thomas Keller, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, J Decker, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11,
Markus Wanner <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Jack Lloyd, 2014/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/13