[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2014 10:17:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
Markus Wanner <address@hidden> writes:
> Interesting, I thought I tested that. But you're right, this looks like
> the macro doesn't do what it's supposed to do. It itself claims:
>
> # The first argument, if specified, indicates whether you insist on an
> # extended mode (e.g. -std=gnu++11) or a strict conformance mode (e.g.
> # -std=c++11). If neither is specified, you get whatever works, with
> # preference for an extended mode.
>
> I left it unspecified, as I'm fine with whatever works (tm).
>
> I corrected the order of tests, now. So for gcc, it now yields the c++??
> rather than gnu++?? variants.
But it says "with preference for an extended mode.", which means it
should pick gnu++ if both work. Which is what it did.
If we are also supporting clang and MSVC, we need c++11, not gnu++11 (I think).
--
-- Stephe
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Rust to the World! [was: C++11], Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16