Re: [Nano-devel] Re: Nano cut/paste bug

[Nick Warne]

On Friday 03 June 2005 18:20, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> Ken Tyler wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>  > Sounds like a bug to me too but as I remember total compatibility with
>  > Pico was important even if it resulted in oddities now and then...
>
> I'm trying to keep it as compatible as possible, but I figure that nano
> isn't supposed to be bug-for-bug compatible in all cases, especially
> with some of the weirder bugs.

Hi all,

New guy here :)

I agree with that statement - surely 'compatible' means intended 
functionality, not buggy quirks.

BTW, been a fan of nano for ages, and recently started to use 1.3 tree - 
excellent work - thank you.

Nick
-- 
"When you're chewing on life's gristle,
Don't grumble, Give a whistle..."