[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable
From: |
Nick Warne |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:14:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
Hi Mike,
On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> still worked for me :/
>
> what version of glibc/ncurses ?
Sorry, missed this one. I guess this doesn't matter now, as I can reproduce
on three totally different boxes re my last crash report to this thread.
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/31
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/29