[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Needle-hackers] Re: Which direction should function arrows point?
From: |
Edwin Zacharias |
Subject: |
[Needle-hackers] Re: Which direction should function arrows point? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:24:33 -0700 (PDT) |
I was reading through the LL1 mailing list archives and I came upon
http://www.ai.mit.edu/%7Egregs/ll1-discuss-archive-html/msg02688.html,
talking about the direction of function arrows. In Lisp in Small
Peices, the author makes the same point but for conversion functions
in a footnote on page 5:
Personally, I don't like names formed like this x->y to indicate a
conversion because this order makes it difficult to understand
compositions; for example, (y->z (x->y ...)) is less straightforward
than (z<-y (y<-x ...)). In contrast, x->y is much easier to read
than y<-x. You can see here one of the many difficulties that
language designers come up againt.
I also have two quick questions about Needle. First does it use static
or dynamic binding, and why? Second, are you going to use any languages
as models for the Needle libraries or create something completely new?
- edwin
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Needle-hackers] Re: Which direction should function arrows point?,
Edwin Zacharias <=