[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:06:14 +0100 |
Hi Jerrad,
> > Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local
> > user names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming
> > `to: address@hidden', and there's no message-id which is
> > vital for
>
> Erm, it's not at all useless, you're misusing it. Fcc is for filing a
> local copy, it expects a folder name, not email addresses or aliases.
Perhaps I wasn't clear. If I have
to: ralph
fcc: +foo
subject: test
----------
end
as a draft then folder foo ends up with a version of the email that has
no message-id header and the `to' header says
to: ralph
as opposed to
to: address@hidden
The former isn't very helpful if I ever wish to dist or forw the email
on. No message-id is a killer.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Joel Reicher, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Neil W Rickert, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Joel Reicher, 2007/03/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Ralph Corderoy, 2007/03/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Jerrad Pierce, 2007/03/31
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Jerry Peek, 2007/03/30