[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names
From: |
Tethys |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:44:25 +0100 |
Paul Fox writes:
> > $(libdir)/ap -format '%(decode(friendly{text}))' '<To/From header>'
>
>you're absolutely right that i've been tweaking the same forms for
>probably 20 years now, and totally missed this modernization.
Ha! You and me both. Having just updated my long untouched scanformat
file, scan now correctly decodes RFC2407 From lines! Yaaaay! I'm all
for using 30 year old software because it mostly Just Works, but I
should really pay more attention to improvements that have been made
in the intervening years to fix the "mostly" part of that sentence...
Tet :-)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names,
Tethys <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/09