[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ...
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ... |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:50:22 -0400 |
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:21:09 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg said:
> But now I'm asking "why would anyone want to change these?" On any given
> UNIX platform, there is one way to lock files in the general case (and perhaps
> separately in the mbox case), and every other app I've seen just compiles in
> those methods and calls it a day. Do we really need to be able to switch this
> stuff at run time?
Only use case I can think of is if the system's native VFS has one preferred
locking method, but some files are on NFS and require different locking?
pgpU27_Jc1Q6r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ...,
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., heymanj, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/06/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking. Horrible, horrible, locking ..., Ken Hornstein, 2013/06/30