[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:10:31 -0400 |
>I run into this at work, primarily from a co-worker running Mutt. While I
>pointed out that this is not valid and pointed to the spec, he has not
>fixed it as it does not break for anyone else.
>
>How hard would it be to enhance the code to not error out in this
>situation. There is a valid e-mail address present.
I thought we did fix it? At least for some cases; take a gander at
the address parser code and you'll see what I mean.
As for fixing it ... take a gander at the address parser code, that
should answer your question.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Kevin Cosgrove, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, David Levine, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Kevin Cosgrove, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, David Levine, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, David Levine, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Kevin Cosgrove, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, David Levine, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Kevin Cosgrove, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/08/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/08/31