[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address
|
From: |
Andy Bradford |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address |
|
Date: |
2 Sep 2015 07:39:52 -0600 |
Thus said Ralph Corderoy on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:33:48 +0100:
> address@hidden ? I've just tweeted https://twitter.com/outlook to
> ask.
Thanks, however, given your interpretation of the RFC, it's possible
that this is no longer necessary.
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055e6fc4b
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Andy Bradford, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address,
Andy Bradford <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/02