[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] [patch] filtering support for inc
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] [patch] filtering support for inc |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:53:50 -0400 |
>I hadn't considered it. I don't use unseen-sequence, but I think it
>would make sense that an explicit `-sequence foo' stopped the implicit
>unseen-sequence update.
Yeah, that was what I was thinking as well.
>As for inc being silent, «inc -forma ''» almost achieves that apart from
>the annoying, noisy, non-Unix, "Incorporating new mail into
>inbox...\n\n".
Well, there IS also >/dev/null, this being Unix and all :-) I think we are
pretty consistent that errors are printed to stderr.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Bob Carragher, 2017/07/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/07/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Bob Carragher, 2017/07/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/07/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Bob Carragher, 2017/07/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., David Levine, 2017/07/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., Ken Hornstein, 2017/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., David Levine, 2017/07/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Volunteer Capacity., David Levine, 2017/07/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [patch] filtering support for inc, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/07/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [patch] filtering support for inc,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [patch] filtering support for inc, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/07/21