Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again

[valdis . kletnieks]

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:21:03 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:

> A better question is ... do you consider a "scan 1-10426" taking 10 seconds
> reasonable?

Well, on my laptop (Dell Latitude, 16G RAM, unfortunately still spinning
oxide), scanning a local folder. 2 runs, first memory-cache cold second
cache-hot:

0 [~] time bash -c '(scan +linux-kernel 1-10426 > /dev/null)'

real    0m17.625s
user    0m1.610s
sys     0m3.358s
0 [~] time bash -c '(scan +linux-kernel 1-10426 > /dev/null)'

real    0m2.164s
user    0m0.850s
sys     0m1.267s
0 [~]

So some of us are seeing 10+ second scans locally.

I really need to upgrade to a 500G SSD. :)  (which I guess answers the
"is it reasonable/tolerable" question :)

pgpW1jz0abClj.pgp
Description: PGP signature