nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 01:10:36 +0100

Hi,

I'm tinkering with SPECS/nmh.spec and SPECS/nmh.cygport, in particular
removing the statement a GUI is required if nmh is to be used as one's
main MUA.  :-)

nmh.cygport's description suggests the xmh package, and that does exist
in Cygwin, but I don't think exmh is packaged?  And nmh.spec, presumably
the basis for the Fedora package, mentions exmh, but doesn't say
"package", and doesn't refer to xmh.

So of the four {Cygwin,Fedora}/{xmh,exmh}, is it only Cygwin/xmh that's
a package?  I'm thinking of referring to that package, but ensure both
programs are mentioned in both.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]