[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions. |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Oct 2017 01:10:36 +0100 |
Hi,
I'm tinkering with SPECS/nmh.spec and SPECS/nmh.cygport, in particular
removing the statement a GUI is required if nmh is to be used as one's
main MUA. :-)
nmh.cygport's description suggests the xmh package, and that does exist
in Cygwin, but I don't think exmh is packaged? And nmh.spec, presumably
the basis for the Fedora package, mentions exmh, but doesn't say
"package", and doesn't refer to xmh.
So of the four {Cygwin,Fedora}/{xmh,exmh}, is it only Cygwin/xmh that's
a package? I'm thinking of referring to that package, but ensure both
programs are mentioned in both.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., Kevin Cosgrove, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., David Levine, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., David Levine, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions., David Levine, 2017/10/28