nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pi


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [nmh-workers] nmh 1.7.1: both bcc and dcc broken for mts sendmail/pipe
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 23:46:47 +0000

Hi az,

> > I'd be tempted to make it an if-then with no else clause by hoisting
> > the "BCC:" prefix and "\n" suffix outside of the if-then.
>
> hmm. i see your point, but don't entirely agree. my aim here was to
> contain all the related logic within the smallest possible/sensible
> horizon.
>
> apart from the small ugliness of having the string "bcc:" hardcoded
> twice i prefer that 'if' block doing its thing (and all of its thing!)
> over strings conditionally accumulating across a pageful of code or
> more.

I don't quite get the comparison so think I may not have got my idea
over.  I don't know the context of the patch's chunk so considered it in
isolation.  The original,

    for (lp = localaddrs.m_next; lp; lp = lp->m_next)
      if (lp->m_bcc)
         allbcc = allbcc? add(concat(", ", lp->m_mbox, NULL), allbcc)
            : mh_xstrdup(lp->m_mbox);
    for (lp = netaddrs.m_next; lp; lp = lp->m_next)
      if (lp->m_bcc)
         allbcc = allbcc? add(
            concat(", ", lp->m_mbox, "@", lp->m_host, NULL),
            allbcc)
            : concat(lp->m_mbox, "@", lp->m_host, NULL);
    if (allbcc)
    {
      fprintf (out, "BCC: %s\n",allbcc);
      free(allbcc);
    }

seems simpler as

    for (lp = localaddrs.m_next; lp; lp = lp->m_next)
        if (lp->m_bcc)
            allbcc = add(concat(", ", lp->m_mbox, NULL), allbcc);

    for (lp = netaddrs.m_next; lp; lp = lp->m_next)
        if (lp->m_bcc)
            allbcc = add(concat(", ", lp->m_mbox, "@", lp->m_host, NULL), 
allbcc);

    if (allbcc) {
        fprintf(out, "BCC: %s\n", allbcc + 1);
        free(allbcc);
    }
 
though I haven't run it, let alone tested it, so it could be simpler but
wrong.  :-)
 
> anyway, these are my personal preferences; i hope we can agree to
> disagree and that somebody with commit rights will apply the patch or
> equivalent to the code.

Yep, absolutely.  I see it's already getting attention from David and
I expect Ken will look too.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]